This Notice of Funding Opportunity (NOFO) encourages applications for investigator-initiated fully remotely delivered and conducted clinical trials to assess the efficacy or effectiveness of complementary and integrative health interventions in NCCIH- designated areas of high research priority. Applications submitted under this NOFO are expected to propose a remotely delivered and conducted fully powered clinical trial with no in-person contact between research staff and study participants and may utilize mHealth tools or technologies. Applicants must provide justification for the remotely delivered approach and provide preliminary data on the feasibility and safety of the approach, along with evidence that the intervention has promise of clinical benefit. Applicants are encouraged to contact the appropriate NCCIH Scientific/Research contact for the area of science for which they are planning to develop an application prior to submitting to this NOFO.

PAR-25-268: Investigator Initiated Clinical Trials of Complementary and Integrative Interventions Delivered Remotely or via mHealth (R01 Clinical Trial Required)

March 31, 2025

This funding opportunity was updated to align with agency priorities. Carefully reread the full funding opportunity and make any needed adjustments to your application prior to submission.

Department of Health and Human Services

Part 1. Overview Information

Participating Organization(s) National Institutes of Health (NIH)

Components of Participating Organizations National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH)

Funding Opportunity Title Investigator Initiated Clinical Trials of Complementary and Integrative Interventions Delivered Remotely or via mHealth (R01 Clinical Trial Required)

Activity Code R01 Research Project Grant

Announcement Type Reissue of PAR-24-083

Related Notices See Notices of Special Interest associated with this funding opportunity

• September 9, 2025 - Notice of Correction to Key Date(s) for PAR-25-268 "Investigator Initiated Clinical Trials of Complementary and Integrative Interventions Delivered Remotely or via mHealth (R01 Clinical Trial Required)". See Notice NOT-AT-25-008.
• March 31, 2025 - This funding opportunity was updated to align with agency priorities. Carefully reread the full funding opportunity and make any needed adjustments to your application prior to submission.
• April 4, 2024 - Overview of Grant Application and Review Changes for Due Dates on or after January 25, 2025. See Notice NOT-OD-24-084.
• August 31, 2022 - Implementation Changes for Genomic Data Sharing Plans Included with Applications Due on or after January 25, 2023. See Notice NOT-OD-22-198.
• August 5, 2022 - Implementation Details for the NIH Data Management and Sharing Policy. See Notice NOT-OD-22-189.

Funding Opportunity Number (FON) PAR-25-268

Companion Funding Opportunity

• PAR-24-275, UG3/UH3 Phase 1 Exploratory/Developmental Cooperative Agreement/Exploratory/Developmental Cooperative Agreement Phase II
• PAR-24-276, U24 Resource-Related Research Project (Cooperative Agreements)
• PAR-25-267, R01 Research Project
• PAR-25-274, R34 Planning Grant

Number of Applications See Section III. 3. Additional Information on Eligibility.

Assistance Listing Number(s) 93.213

Funding Opportunity Purpose This Notice of Funding Opportunity (NOFO) encourages applications for investigator-initiated fully remotely delivered and conducted clinical trials to assess the efficacy or effectiveness of complementary and integrative health interventions in NCCIH-designated areas of high research priority. Applications submitted under this NOFO are expected to propose a remotely delivered and conducted fully powered clinical trial with no in-person contact between research staff and study participants and may utilize mHealth tools or technologies. Applicants must provide justification for the remotely delivered approach and provide preliminary data on the feasibility and safety of the approach, along with evidence that the intervention has promise of clinical benefit.

Applicants are encouraged to contact the appropriate NCCIH Scientific/Research contact for the area of science for which they are planning to develop an application prior to submitting to this NOFO.

Funding Opportunity Goal(s) The National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH) provides funding for research into complementary and integrative health approaches. Research constituting a rigorous evidence base for complementary health approaches will be developed through a range of research strategies including basic and translational research, and clinical investigation.

Key Dates

All applications are due by 5:00 PM local time of applicant organization.

Applicants are encouraged to apply early to allow adequate time to make any corrections to errors found in the application during the submission process by the due date.

Expiration Date November 18, 2026

Due Dates for E.O. 12372 Not Applicable

Required Application Instructions It is critical that applicants follow the instructions in the Research (R) Instructions in the How to Apply - Application Guide, except where instructed to do otherwise (in this NOFO or in a Notice from NIH Guide for Grants and Contracts).

Conformance to all requirements (both in the Application Guide and the NOFO) is required and strictly enforced. Applicants must read and follow all application instructions in the Application Guide as well as any program-specific instructions noted in Section IV. When the program-specific instructions deviate from those in the Application Guide, follow the program-specific instructions.

Applications that do not comply with these instructions may be delayed or not accepted for review.

There are several options available to submit your application through Grants.gov to NIH and Department of Health and Human Services partners. You must use one of these submission options to access the application forms for this opportunity.

• Use the NIH ASSIST system to prepare, submit and track your application online.
• Use an institutional system-to-system (S2S) solution to prepare and submit your application to Grants.gov and eRA Commons to track your application. Check with your institutional officials regarding availability.
• Use Grants.gov Workspace to prepare and submit your application and eRA Commons to track your application.

Table of Contents

• Part 1. Overview Information
  • Key Dates
• Part 2. Full Text of Announcement
  • Section I. Notice of Funding Opportunity Description
  • Section II. Award Information
  • Section III. Eligibility Information
  • Section IV. Application and Submission Information
  • Section V. Application Review Information
  • Section VI. Award Administration Information
  • Section VII. Agency Contacts
  • Section VIII. Other Information

Part 2. Full Text of Announcement

Section I. Notice of Funding Opportunity Description

Background: The National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH) is committed to rigorous investigation of promising complementary and integrative health interventions with physical and/or psychological inputs (often called mind and body approaches), and nutritional approaches, including natural products. For the purposes of this notice of funding opportunity (NOFO), nutritional approaches include botanicals, probiotics, and products marketed as dietary supplements; mind and body approaches include meditation approaches (e.g., mindfulness), hypnosis or guided imagery, meditative movement approaches (e.g., yoga, tai chi, qi gong), body-based approaches (e.g., progressive muscle relaxation, acupressure), music or art-based therapy; or a combination of these approaches (e.g., mindfulness-based stress reduction). These approaches are often widely used by the public, and they are increasingly recognized to provide a complementary approach to symptom management (e.g., chronic pain, mild depression, anxiety). These approaches can be used by individuals to help prevent, treat, or self-manage various conditions, and they can be complementary to conventional health care.

Overview of NCCIH Mind and Body Clinical Trials Research Funding Opportunities: NCCIH has designed a framework for research to describe the broad spectrum of complementary and integrative health research it supports (https://www.nccih.nih.gov/grants/nccih-research-framework). NCCIH supports investigators working on the continuum of the research framework, from basic science and feasibility research through high-impact clinical trials as well as research on dissemination and implementation (https://www.nccih.nih.gov/grants/funding/clinicaltrials). We encourage investigators to examine the full suite of notices of funding opportunities (NOFOs) to determine which one best aligns with the proposed stage of intervention development and testing.

NCCIH has an oversight process to provide stewardship and maintain excellence, integrity, and rigor in our supported clinical studies (https://www.nccih.nih.gov/grants/toolbox). Investigators are encouraged to review the NCCIH Clinical Terms of Award for Human Subjects Research (https://www.nccih.nih.gov/research/nccih-clinical-terms-of-award-for-human-subjects-research) to learn more about NCCIH's requirements.

Prior to submitting an application, NCCIH strongly encourages consultation with the NCCIH Scientific/Research contacts relevant to the area of science for which they are planning to develop an application. Early contact provides an opportunity for NCCIH staff to discuss the scope and goals, and to provide information and guidance.

Overview of Remotely Delivered Interventions: Increasingly, researchers are incorporating mobile health (mHealth) technologies to remotely deliver interventions, including complementary and integrative health interventions. These remotely delivered interventions may utilize phone delivery, app-based approaches, video delivery, web-based platforms, wearable devices, and/or new technologies. The rapid expansion of mHealth technologies makes it possible to digitally transmit participant data from remote areas to centrally based researchers and interventionists, deliver feedback, and capture all interactions in a database. Additionally, these mHealth technologies have the potential to improve and increase access to complementary and integrative health approaches to address existing health disparities.

Many commercially available mHealth complementary and integrative health approaches already exist. However, rigorously designed research is needed to test the usefulness and safety of remotely delivered complementary and integrative interventions for given conditions/disorders and/or for health promotion. For clinical trials to address this need, they must be well-designed and appropriately powered to test clinically relevant hypotheses. To that end, before proposing an efficacy or effectiveness clinical trial, it is necessary to conduct early-phase clinical trials to collect the multiple types of preliminary feasibility data needed to rigorously design a definitive clinical trial. Applications submitted under this NOFO would be appropriate when there is a clear and compelling rationale, a rigorous empirical basis, strong feasibility and safety data, and scientific premise to conduct a fully powered remotely delivered efficacy, effectiveness, or pragmatic clinical trial.

Research Objectives of Remotely Delivered mHealth Complementary and Integrative Health Interventions (R01): This NOFO supports remotely delivered clinical trials (e.g., efficacy, effectiveness or pragmatic trials) to study the effects of complementary and integrative health interventions in NCCIH-designated areas of high research priority. Proposed clinical trials may utilize a design anywhere along the continuum between explanatory and pragmatic. For this NOFO, pragmatic trials are considered those that test an intervention under the usual conditions in which it will be applied in the ‘real world' while explanatory trials do so under more idealized circumstances. For example, pragmatic trials may employ interventions that would not require research staff to interact directly with participants, such as clinician decision support tools embedded in the electronic health record, system changes within the health care system, or when complementary interventions are implemented and delivered within the health care setting. The trial design should be appropriate for the study question.

Study Design Considerations: For this NOFO, the proposed trial must study an intervention that can be delivered in a fully remote manner, and all data collected remotely (i.e., no in-person contact between research staff and study participants). The application should propose to recruit a representative sample for the population and condition of interest, and to conduct all study activities, including recruitment, intervention delivery, and data collection, remotely. The proposed remotely delivered clinical trial should utilize methods that allow for the participation of geographically distributed participants (e.g., not limited to a single city or location). Applications to this NOFO should be based on a strong rationale for the need of a fully remotely delivered design as opposed to a multi-site in-person clinical trial. Trials supported under this NOFO are expected to contribute to research topics relevant to the mission of NCCIH and be designed with a minimum of 90-percent power to test the primary hypothesis. The choice of study design (e.g., standard efficacy, effectiveness, and/or pragmatic randomized control trial) should be justified scientifically. In all cases, there should be strong rationale for the proposed comparator condition(s) (e.g., time and attention control, usual care, standard of care, sham condition, and/or active comparator(s)) based on the research question you plan to address. Due to lack of rigor and potential expectancy effects, NCCIH will not support studies proposing a waitlist comparator condition.

Group-Based Interventions: In some cases, investigators who wish to evaluate the effect of an intervention on a health-related biomedical or behavioral outcome may propose a study in which (1) groups or clusters are assigned to study arms and individual observations are analyzed to evaluate the effect of the intervention, or (2) participants are assigned individually to study arms but receive at least some of their intervention in a real or virtual group or through a shared facilitator. Investigators should provide a strong rationale for the choice among trial design options. The selection of study design should be guided by decisions about how best to deliver the intervention and by concerns regarding contamination and logistics. Applicants should show that their methods are appropriate given their plans for assignment of participants and delivery of interventions. Additional information is available at https://researchmethodsresources.nih.gov/.

In traditional randomized clinical trials (RCTs), individual participants are randomized to receive an intervention that is delivered individually (e.g., a specific natural product, individually delivered hypnosis, massage). When an intervention can be delivered in a group, there are several methods of randomizing participants. The first option is an individually randomized group treatment trial (IRGT, where individual participants are randomized to one of the interventions, but the intervention is delivered in small groups (e.g., Mindfulness based Stress Reduction or tai chi classes). The second option is a group-randomized trial (GRT), also called a cluster randomized trial (cRCT), where groups of participants are randomized to study conditions, often defined by their workplace, school, primary care provider, or community. In cRCTs, the intervention provided to the randomized groups can be delivered individually, in small groups, or the entire randomized group.

The study biostatistician will need to consider how the chosen study design led to the proposed data analyses and sample size estimations. The justification should include discussion of the positive intraclass correlation expected in data obtained from participants in the same groups or clusters (IRGT, GRT, or cRCT). In general, these types of studies need to consider how the data analyses and sample size addressed the extra variation in the data and degrees of freedom available to estimate that extra variation. Failure to account for this variable in sample size calculations can result in underpowered studies.

In addition to scientific relevance and excellence, these clinical trials are expected to be conducted with a high degree of efficiency, with streamlined administrative procedures wherever possible. These trials are expected to achieve the Phase III trial requirements of NIH (see https://grants.nih.gov/policy/clinical-trials/glossary-ct.htm and https://grants.nih.gov/policy/inclusion/women-and-minorities.htm).

For applications that propose the use of a dietary supplement, drug, or device as part of the intervention, the applicants must contact the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) prior to applying to determine whether an Investigational New Drug (IND) or an Investigational Device Exemption (IDE) application is necessary for the proposed clinical research. This NOFO will not support trials of natural products that are regulated by the Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) as a controlled substance.

For applications that propose the use of an app or clinical decision support software, applicants must consult with their institutional review board (IRB) to determine whether the approach may qualify as a medical device. If so, applicants must contact the FDA prior to applying to determine whether an IDE application is necessary for the proposed clinical research (https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/software-medical-device-samd/your-clinical-decision-support-software-it-medical-device).

Mechanistic Measures There are often questions about whether efficacy, effectiveness, or pragmatic trials should include any mechanistic aims to evaluate how interventions work. Mechanistic outcomes could be included in trials submitted to this NOFO, if a strong rationale is provided such as the need to assess whether the effect of the intervention is mediated via the measured mechanism. The inclusion of mechanistic outcomes should not introduce significant burden for participants or utilize a significant portion of the budget. NCCIH has other funding mechanisms to support basic, mechanistic and translational research (NOT-AT-21-006).

Preliminary Data Requirement

Preliminary Data About the Intervention: This NOFO is appropriate when there is a clear and compelling rationale, a rigorous empirical basis, and a scientific premise to conduct a remotely delivered efficacy, effectiveness, or pragmatic clinical trial. The following preliminary data from previous human studies (from published literature or the team’s previous research) on a similar intervention and in a similar patient population and age group as proposed in the current application are required:

• Demonstration that an intervention similar to the one proposed in the trial is well tolerated (does not produce frequent severe adverse events) in pilot human studies.
• Pilot feasibility data on a similar intervention in a clinical population similar to the one that will be studied in the proposed trial (e.g., a proposed study to examine vinyasa yoga in adults with anxiety may cite pilot work on hatha yoga in a population of adults with depression and anxiety).
• Demonstrated adherence and fidelity (e.g., cite a pilot study of a similar duration with sufficient adherence and fidelity to the intervention across sites/instructors).
• Demonstrated retention of participants for a similar study duration (e.g., cite a pilot study that retained a sufficient percentage of participants at the primary outcome time point).
• Demonstrated remote recruitment methods that meet data security standards for collecting and accessing individual-level data.
• Demonstration that the primary outcome is a valid measure for the proposed condition and population.
• Information to justify the selection of how the intervention is delivered (e.g., format of remote delivery, duration of individual intervention, frequency of delivery, and timeline of intervention delivery to achieve clinical benefit) in the study. For example, the intervention could be delivered as a single 30-minute session once a week for 8 weeks, or as self-paced 5-minute modules over 10 weeks. Preliminary data should demonstrate that the selected doses are feasible and likely to have the greatest impact on clinical outcome and minimize the risk of adverse events.
• Demonstration from pilot studies that potential adverse events can be monitored and addressed remotely.

Preliminary Data about the Team: In addition, all of the following preliminary data demonstrating the team’s collective experience conducting clinical trials are required:

• Delivered a similar intervention via the same delivery mode in a clinical trial with fidelity using remote methods.
• Successfully recruited and accrued similar participants using remote methods.
• Successfully randomized participants to similar intervention and control conditions using remote methods.
• Achieved adherence to a similar intervention study protocol by research staff using remote methods.
• Retained participants for a similar study duration using remote methods.
• Completed collection of follow-up data with consistency and minimal missing data using remote methods.
• Published results from previous completed trials using remote methods.

Natural Products Preliminary Data: In addition, for applications utilizing a natural product, the following preliminary data from human studies (published and citable data from the peer-reviewed literature) on the same product and specific formulation as proposed in the current application are required:

• Demonstration that the natural product can produce a clinically meaningful and measurable change in target engagement (e.g., mechanism of action) in the human population of interest. There must also be evidence that the change in target engagement has been replicated in a separate human study with the same natural product to be used in the proposed project, unless it is impossible or impractical to do so or when a mechanism of action has been clearly established.
• Evidence that the specific natural product is bioavailable in humans. Note that for prebiotics or probiotics this may be demonstrated by documenting short-term retention in the gastrointestinal tract.
• Information to justify the selection of the dose(s) of the product proposed to be used in the study. Data should demonstrate that the selected doses are likely to have the greatest impact on target engagement and minimize the risk of adverse events.
• Evidence that evaluates the pilot study data for strength of correlation between the impact on target engagement and changes in the clinical outcomes that will be studied in the proposed clinical trial.
• Pharmacokinetic data on the specific natural product and formulation to be used in the proposed trial to justify the dosing frequency in the proposed trial and demonstrate initial safety of the product. PK studies are not required for natural products that do not require absorption for their intended effect (e.g. prebiotics and probiotics).
• Evidence that the natural product does not produce frequent or severe adverse events in human pilot trials.

For applications that include a mind and body approach as part of a multi-component intervention, the application must provide published data that the mind and body intervention proposed has demonstrated efficacy for the condition being studied from at least one fully powered controlled trial.

For the purposes of this NOFO, it is preferred that there be an established, measurable, reproducible, well-characterized target engagement measure for a given natural product in human subjects. However, NCCIH acknowledges that for some conditions, it may be impossible or impractical to directly measure the target engagement on a natural product. In these circumstances the study should be justified by: (1) a clear rationale for why studying target engagement in human participants is impossible or impractical; (2) potentially proposing other objective, reproducible measures, that may be proxy to, or indicative of target engagement of the natural product; and (3) strong compelling preliminary data to warrant further study of a natural product in clinical studies. In other cases, a fundamental understanding of a given natural product’s biologic target, or mechanism of action has been clearly established (e.g., compound’s affinity for a specific receptor is well established). In these situations, investigators are also encouraged to contact NCCIH Scientific/Research staff to determine whether this NOFO is the appropriate funding opportunity for the proposed clinical trial.

Timeline Investigators should design a realistic timeline for the startup and completion of the clinical trial and provide contingency plans to proactively confront potential delays or disturbances to the planned trial.

NCCIH Priorities for Clinical Trials of Mind and Body Interventions NCCIH has identified targeted areas of investigation to align with the NCCIH Strategic Plan (https://www.nccih.nih.gov/about/strategic-plans-and-reports). For this funding opportunity, applications will be considered high programmatic priority if they address one of following criteria related to the intervention of study:

• The complementary or integrative approaches with physical and/or psychological therapeutic inputs (often called mind and body interventions) should include one or more of the following:
  • Physical approaches such as spinal manipulation or mobilization, massage, tai chi, qi gong, yoga, acupuncture; or
  • Psychological approaches such as hypnosis, guided imagery, breathing exercises, progressive relaxation, meditation, biofeedback, mindfulness techniques, music or other art-based therapies
• Multi-component interventions such a naturopathic medicine, traditional Chinese medicine, Ayurvedic medicine, chiropractic care, or a combination of two or more of the specific complementary health approaches (e.g., massage and biofeedback, or natural product and mindfulness); or integrated approaches to care in which a complementary health approach is used in combination with standard care (e.g., mindfulness or yoga as augmentation to conventional medications); or
• Multilevel intervention level (patient, caregivers of patient, clinicians, and health care system) where at least one level of intervention includes a mind and body intervention.

In addition, proposed projects could include an outcome measure(s) that relates to at least one of the following high-priority topic areas that include:

• Promotion of health behaviors, health restoration, emotional well-being, or resilience;
• Prevention or treatment of symptoms such as sleep disorders or disturbances, depression, anxiety, chronic stress, post-traumatic stress (disorder), obesity, and acute and chronic pain conditions;
• Whole person health outcomes including multisystem or multilevel outcomes;
• Reduction of disparities in areas such as pain, obesity, mental and emotional behavioral health, and maternal health;
• Social and structural determinants of health (https://www.ninr.nih.gov/researchandfunding/nih-sdohrcc);
• Enhancement of adherence to medications or prescribed behavioral approaches (e.g., physical activity and healthy eating);
• Reduction or deprescribing of inappropriate use of medications or other substances (e.g., drugs of abuse or medications that are contraindicated in specific patient populations); or
• Reduction in risk for/incidence of HIV, or comorbidities, coinfections and complications from HIV (https://abs2.od.nih.gov/Docs/NIH_StrategicPlan_FY2021-2025.pdf)

NCCIH Priorities for Clinical Trials of Natural Products NCCIH has identified targeted areas of high program priority for clinical trials on natural products. Focus is on management of conditions for which natural products are used by the public and where there is evidence of postulated mechanism of action. For this NOFO, NCCIH considers the following topic areas to have high program priority:

• Symptom management, particularly the use of natural products for sleep disorder/disturbance, management of pain conditions, common gastrointestinal disorders, post-acute sequelae SARS-CoV-2 infection (PASC), or mental health conditions such as those commonly managed in primary care (e.g., chronic stress, depression, anxiety disorders, or post-traumatic stress).
• Studies to examine the effects of prebiotics/probiotics and other natural products on gut microbiome-brain interactions. Of particular interest are studies of prebiotics/probiotics for depression, anxiety disorders, irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), or chronic pain.
• Studies to reduce disparities in conditions noted above.
• Studies to examine the effects of natural products to address comorbidities, coinfections and/or complications from HIV (https://abs2.od.nih.gov/Docs/NIH_StrategicPlan_FY2021-2025.pdf)

When evidence justifies, NCCIH encourages applications to conduct studies in a way that assesses the impact of integrating interventions into relevant settings (e.g., health care systems, schools, Federally Qualified Health Centers, military or veteran health care delivery organizations, community organizations, justice systems, or homeless shelters).

All NIH-funded research must adhere to the Code of Federal Regulations, which outlines specific requirements to enhance protections for pregnant women, human fetuses, and neonates; children; and prisoners (https://grants.nih.gov/policy/humansubjects/policies-and-regulations/vulnerable-populations.htm). The Inclusion Across the Lifespan policy requires that individuals of all ages, including children (i.e., individuals under the age of 18) and older adults, must be included in all human subjects research, conducted or supported by NIH, unless there are scientific or ethical reasons not to include them (https://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-18-116.html).

Applications proposing research topics not identified above as high programmatic priority can be submitted but are likely to be considered of lesser or low programmatic priority, which will significantly influence programmatic relevance and reduce the likelihood of funding. Applications proposing research studies using an intervention and patient population that are the same as or very similar to those used in studies already in progress, conducted, or published by other groups are likely to be lower programmatic priority.

Clinical Trials Not Responsive to this NOFO: The following types of clinical trials are not responsive to this NOFO and applications proposing such activities will be deemed non-responsive and not reviewed:

• Clinical trials with any in-person contact of research staff with research participants.
• Studies that do not have a primary aim to assess efficacy or effectiveness of the intervention.
• Clinical trials proposing to deliver an intervention to participants outside the United States or Canada.
• Studies that are geographically limited (e.g., recruiting from one city or region).
• Studies that propose a waitlist control.
• Trials that include a natural product that is regulated by the DEA as a controlled substance.
• Trials that propose to assess efficacy or effectiveness of interventions for the treatment or prevention of cancer. (Investigators interested in cancer treatment or prevention trials should contact the National Cancer Institute.)

Investigators proposing NIH-defined clinical trials may refer to the Research Methods Resources website for information about developing statistical methods and study designs.

See Section VIII. Other Information for award authorities and regulations.

Section II. Award Information

Funding Instrument Grant: A financial assistance mechanism providing money, property, or both to an eligible entity to carry out an approved project or activity.

Application Types Allowed

• New
• Renewal
• Resubmission
• Revision

The OER Glossary and the How to Apply Application Guide provide details on these application types. Only those application types listed here are allowed for this NOFO.

Clinical Trial? Required: Only accepting applications that propose clinical trial(s).

Need help determining whether you are doing a clinical trial?

Funds Available and Anticipated Number of Awards The number of awards is contingent upon NIH appropriations and the submission of a sufficient number of meritorious applications.

Award Budget Application budgets are not limited but need to reflect the actual needs of the proposed project.

Award Project Period The scope of the proposed project should determine the project period. The maximum project period is 5 years.

NIH grants policies as described in the NIH Grants Policy Statement will apply to the applications submitted and awards made from this NOFO.

Section III. Eligibility Information

1. Eligible Applicants

Eligible Organizations

• Higher Education Institutions
  • Public/State Controlled Institutions of Higher Education
  • Private Institutions of Higher Education
• Nonprofits Other Than Institutions of Higher Education
  • Nonprofits with 501(c)(3) IRS Status (Other than Institutions of Higher Education)
  • Nonprofits without 501(c)(3) IRS Status (Other than Institutions of Higher Education)
• For-Profit Organizations
  • Small Businesses
  • For-Profit Organizations (Other than Small Businesses)
• Local Governments
• State Governments
• County Governments
• City or Township Governments
• Special District Governments
• Indian/Native American Tribal Governments (Federally Recognized)
• Indian/Native American Tribal Governments (Other than Federally Recognized).
• Federal Governments
  • Eligible Agencies of the Federal Government
• U.S. Territory or Possession
• Other
  • Independent School Districts
  • Public Housing Authorities/Indian Housing Authorities
  • Native American Tribal Organizations (other than Federally recognized tribal governments)
  • Faith-based or Community-based Organizations
  • Regional Organizations

Foreign Organizations Non-domestic (non-U.S.) Entities (Foreign Organizations) are not eligible to apply.

Non-domestic (non-U.S.) components of U.S. Organizations are not eligible to apply.

Foreign components, as defined in the NIH Grants Policy Statement, are allowed.

Required Registrations

Applicant Organizations Applicant organizations must complete and maintain the following registrations as described in the How to Apply- Application Guide to be eligible to apply for or receive an award. All registrations must be completed prior to the application being submitted. Registration can take 6 weeks or more, so applicants should begin the registration process as soon as possible. Failure to complete registrations in advance of a due date is not a valid reason for a late submission, please reference the NIH Grants Policy Statement Section 2.3.9.2 Electronically Submitted Applications for additional information.

• System for Award Management (SAM) – Applicants must complete and maintain an active registration, which requires renewal at least annually. The renewal process may require as much time as the initial registration. SAM registration includes the assignment of a Commercial and Government Entity (CAGE) Code for domestic organizations which have not already been assigned a CAGE Code.
• NATO Commercial and Government Entity (NCAGE) Code – Foreign organizations must obtain an NCAGE code (in lieu of a CAGE code) in order to register in SAM.
• Unique Entity Identifier (UEI) - A UEI is issued as part of the SAM.gov registration process. The same UEI must be used for all registrations, as well as on the grant application.
• eRA Commons - Once the unique organization identifier is established, organizations can register with eRA Commons in tandem with completing their Grants.gov registrations; all registrations must be in place by time of submission. eRA Commons requires organizations to identify at least one Signing Official (SO) and at least one Program Director/Principal Investigator (PD/PI) account in order to submit an application.
• Grants.gov – Applicants must have an active SAM registration in order to complete the Grants.gov registration.

Program Directors/Principal Investigators (PD(s)/PI(s)) All PD(s)/PI(s) must have an eRA Commons account. PD(s)/PI(s) should work with their organizational officials to either create a new account or to affiliate their existing account with the applicant organization in eRA Commons. If the PD/PI is also the organizational Signing Official, they must have two distinct eRA Commons accounts, one for each role. Obtaining an eRA Commons account can take up to 2 weeks.

Eligible Individuals (Program Director/Principal Investigator) Any individual(s) with the skills, knowledge, and resources necessary to carry out the proposed research as the Program Director(s)/Principal Investigator(s) (PD(s)/PI(s)) is invited to work with their organization to develop an application for support.

For institutions/organizations proposing multiple PDs/PIs, visit the Multiple Program Director/Principal Investigator Policy and submission details in the Senior/Key Person Profile (Expanded) Component of the How to Apply-Application Guide.

2. Cost Sharing This NOFO does not require cost sharing as defined in the NIH Grants Policy Statement Section 1.2 Definition of Terms.

3. Additional Information on Eligibility

Number of Applications Applicant organizations may submit more than one application, provided that each application is scientifically distinct.

The NIH will not accept duplicate or highly overlapping applications under review at the same time, per NIH Grants Policy Statement Section 2.3.7.4 Submission of Resubmission Application. This means that the NIH will not accept:

• A new (A0) application that is submitted before issuance of the summary statement from the review of an overlapping new (A0) or resubmission (A1) application.
• A resubmission (A1) application that is submitted before issuance of the summary statement from the review of the previous new (A0) application.
• An application that has substantial overlap with another application pending appeal of initial peer review (see NIH Grants Policy Statement 2.3.9.4 Similar, Essentially Identical, or Identical Applications).

Applications with Foreign components are encouraged to read NCCIH International Health Research page. Foreign components can include foreign collaborators or consultants, but should not include foreign sites outside of the U.S. or Canada, according to NCCIH’s policy.

Section IV. Application and Submission Information

1. Requesting an Application Package The application forms package specific to this opportunity must be accessed through ASSIST, Grants.gov Workspace or an institutional system-to-system solution. Links to apply using ASSIST or Grants.gov Workspace are available in Part 1 of this NOFO. See your administrative office for instructions if you plan to use an institutional system-to-system solution.

2. Content and Form of Application Submission It is critical that applicants follow the instructions in the Research (R) Instructions in the How to Apply - Application Guide except where instructed in this notice of funding opportunity to do otherwise. Conformance to the requirements in the Application Guide is required and strictly enforced. Applications that are out of compliance with these instructions may be delayed or not accepted for review.

Page Limitations All page limitations described in the How to Apply- Application Guide and the Table of Page Limits must be followed.

Instructions for Application Submission The following section supplements the instructions found in the How to Apply- Application Guide and should be used for preparing an application to this NOFO.

• SF424(R&R) Cover All instructions in the How to Apply - Application Guide must be followed.

• SF424(R&R) Project/Performance Site Locations All instructions in the How to Apply- Application Guide must be followed.

• SF424(R&R) Other Project Information All instructions in the How to Apply- Application Guide must be followed.

• SF424(R&R) Senior/Key Person Profile All instructions in the How to Apply- Application Guide must be followed. The PD/PI (or multi-PDs/PIs) of the clinical trial must be experienced in the conduct of remotely delivered clinical trials and have expertise in the content area of the trial. We strongly encourage that all clinical trials include a biostatistician, and the application should reflect their roles and responsibilities in the design and implementation of the study protocol. Applicants are encouraged to provide strong evidence of the study team’s qualifications and ability to conduct the proposed research and previous investigative experience in related clinical trials.

• R&R or Modular Budget All instructions in the How to Apply- Application Guide must be followed. The budget for the first year of the grant should reflect the implementation timeline. Include budget support for enrolling varying participants. Costs may include, but are not limited to, recruitment and retention costs, translation services and/or interpreters, and costs for using validated measures in multiple languages. If parts of the costs of the trial are to be provided by sources other than NIH, these contributions must be presented in detail in the budget justification. Include budget support for the publication and dissemination of findings. The application should include in its budget all costs associated with preparation of materials for Data and Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) meetings and travel for key personnel to all in-person DSMB meetings. This includes the costs for preparing reports for open and closed portions of DSMB meetings. Budgets should include costs for unmasked biostatistician(s) for generating the randomization scheme and preparing unmasked DSMB reports in addition to the study’s masked biostatistician who will conduct study analyses at the end of the trial and prepare open reports for the DSMB. An independent DSMB will be established to monitor data and oversee participant safety in the clinical trial. NCCIH and the investigator team will determine if the DSMB will be appointed and established by NCCIH or by the investigator team, in accordance with NIH and NCCIH policies. Applicants should provide areas of expertise of DSMB members but not propose DSMB members in the application, or even inquire about the interest of possible DSMB members, because anyone so contacted would not be eligible to serve as a member of the peer review committee that will evaluate the applications for scientific merit.

• R&R Subaward Budget All instructions in the How to Apply-Application Guide must be followed.

• PHS 398 Cover Page Supplement All instructions in the How to Apply- Application Guide must be followed.

• PHS 398 Research Plan All instructions in the How to Apply- Application Guide must be followed, with the following additional instructions:

  Research Strategy The Research Strategy should be organized in a manner that will facilitate peer review. The body of the application must present an overview of the state of the science, current status and relevance of the trial, a discussion of the specific protocol, and the approach to data collection and analysis.

  The following criteria must be addressed:

  • Importance of Research: The significance and innovation of the proposed clinical trial and importance of the question must be clearly stated. It is particularly important that there be a discussion of how the trial will test the proposed hypotheses and why there is clinical equipoise. The application should make clear the need for and timeliness of the study, with emphasis on how the results will address an evidence gap and therefore advance our knowledge of theory and practice in this area. A discussion of the costs and benefits of the study should be included for evaluation of the trial’s significance. Explain how the application challenges and seeks to shift current research or clinical practice paradigms. Describe plans to include mechanisms for leveraging novel collaboration and/or study oversight strategies.
  • Rigor and Feasibility: The research approach section should include a description of the supporting data, clinical trial experience, the experimental approach, and a milestone plan. The application should provide justification for a remotely delivered design.
    • Supporting Data: The studies that led to the proposed clinical trial should be presented. Data from pilot studies conducted by the team or published in the literature that show the need for and the feasibility of the trial should also be presented. Additional supporting data from other research should be included so that the approach chosen is clearly justified and adequately framed. Applications must include the following preliminary data from human studies (preferably published in the literature) using a similar intervention in a similar patient population to the one proposed in the current study:
      • Demonstration that an intervention similar to the one proposed in the trial is well tolerated (does not produce frequent severe adverse events) in pilot human studies.
      • Pilot feasibility data on a similar intervention in a clinical population similar to the one that will be studied in the proposed trial (e.g., a proposed study to examine vinyasa yoga in adults with anxiety may cite pilot work on hatha yoga in a population of adults with depression and anxiety).
      • Demonstrated adherence and fidelity (e.g., cite a pilot study of a similar duration with sufficient adherence and fidelity to the intervention across sites/instructors).
      • Demonstrated retention of participants for a similar study duration (e.g., cite a pilot study that retained a sufficient percentage of participants at the primary outcome time point).
      • Demonstrated remote recruitment methods that meet data security standards for collecting and accessing individual-level data.
      • Demonstration that the primary outcome is a valid measure for the proposed condition and population.
      • Information to justify the selection of how the intervention is delivered (e.g., format of remote delivery, duration of individual intervention, frequency of delivery, and timeline of intervention delivery to achieve clinical benefit) in the study. For example, the intervention could be delivered as a single 30-minute session once a week for 8 weeks, or as self-paced 5-minute modules over 10 weeks. Preliminary data should demonstrate that the selected doses are feasible and likely to have the greatest impact on clinical outcome and minimize the risk of adverse events.
      • Demonstration from pilot studies that potential adverse events can be monitored and addressed remotely.
    • Preliminary Data about the Team: In addition, all of the following preliminary data demonstrating the team’s collective experience conducting clinical trials are required:
      • Delivered a similar intervention via the same delivery mode in a clinical trial with fidelity using remote methods.
      • Successfully recruited and accrued similar participants using remote methods.
      • Successfully randomized participants to similar intervention and control conditions using remote methods.
      • Achieved adherence to a similar intervention study protocol by research staff using remote methods.
      • Retained participants for a similar study duration using remote methods.
      • Completed collection of follow-up data with consistency and minimal missing data using remote methods.
      • Published results from previous completed trials using remote methods.
    • Natural Products Preliminary Data: In addition, for applications utilizing a natural product, the following preliminary data from human studies on the same product and specific formulation as proposed in the current application are required:
      • Demonstration that the natural product can produce a clinically meaningful change in a target engagements) in the human population of interest. There must also be evidence that the change in target engagement has been replicated in a separate human study with the same natural product to be used in the proposed project.
      • Information to justify the selection of the dose(s) of the product proposed to be used in the study. Data should demonstrate that the selected doses are likely to have the greatest impact on the target engagement and minimize the risk of adverse events.
      • Evidence that demonstrates a strong correlation between the impact of the natural product on the target engagement and changes in the clinical outcomes that will be studied in the proposed clinical trial.
      • Pharmacokinetic data on the specific natural product and formulation to be used in the proposed trial to justify the dosing frequency in the proposed trial and demonstrate initial safety of the product (if applicable). NCCIH acknowledges that for some conditions, it may be impossible or impractical to directly measure the impact of a natural product on a target engagement. In these circumstances, the study should be justified by: (1) a clear rationale for why studying a target engagement in human participants is impossible or impractical; (2) potentially proposing other objective, reproducible measures that may be proxy to, or indicative of, target engagement for the natural product; and (3) strong compelling preliminary data to warrant further study of a natural product in clinical studies. In these situations, investigators are also encouraged to contact NCCIH Scientific/Research staff to determine whether this NOFO is the appropriate funding opportunity for the proposed clinical trial. Conceptualization and planning must have progressed to a stage sufficient to allow for an overall assessment of the likelihood of the success of the trial.
  • Experimental Approach: The proposed experimental approach should include an appropriate design and the rationale for the particular design chosen (e.g., pragmatic, explanatory, cluster-randomized). The experimental approach description should include:
    • A description of why the study population is the most appropriate group to answer the question, and how or if results will generalize to a broader population.
    • A rationale for the research hypothesis(es), methods of randomization if applicable, primary and secondary outcome measures, intervention(s), and participant follow-up procedures.
    • A description of the required training and/or licensure/credentialing of individuals remotely providing the intervention across geographic locations if necessary.
    • A rationale for the remote-delivery mode and the complementary and integrative health intervention to be tested, including elements of the intervention, proposed methods for assessing fidelity of intervention delivery and intervention performance, time duration of delivery (for clinician-provided interventions) or participant practice (in remote groups or individual/home settings), and frequency of delivery or practice.
    • A summary of the necessary agreements for the remote delivery of the intervention and comparison intervention by given clinicians or appropriately trained/certified instructors (if applicable).
    • A description and justification for all assessments, including clinical, laboratory, physiological, behavioral, patient-centered, or other outcomes addressing the primary and secondary research questions. Remote data-collection methods should be described. Use of patient-reported outcomes, including those available through the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS), NIH Toolbox, and Quality of Life in Neurological Disorders (NeuroQoL), as well as nontraditional data collection approaches (e.g., electronic health records, telephone, mobile devices, or web-based systems) need to be described. A description of the laboratory evaluations (as appropriate) and plans to implement and monitor Good Clinical Practices (GCP), Good Laboratory Practices (GLP), and Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP), as appropriate should be provided.
    • Investigators should utilize instruments validated in multiple languages representing the complexity of their participant population.
    • A discussion of potential challenges in implementing the research protocol and how they will be addressed.
    • A description and justification of remote recruitment and consenting methods, including methods to confirm the authenticity of participants (e.g., not fictitious or bot enrollees).
    • A description of methods to protect participant confidentiality that meet data security standards for collecting, transferring, and accessing individual-level data remotely.
    • Contingency plans if the effect size or event rate is underestimated.
    • A timeline, which could be provided as a table or graph, for reaching important study milestones such as: (a) obtaining regulatory approval of the final protocol; (b) establishing agreements with participating partners, if relevant; (c) finalizing the study procedures and training participating clinical site staff; and (d) starting enrollment and completing all subject follow-up and data collection activities.
    • A description of the strategy for timely publication and dissemination of results.
  • Investigators should check https://reporter.nih.gov/ and https://clinicaltrials.gov/ to provide justification that the work proposed is not duplicative of completed or ongoing trials. Applicants should not propose work that duplicates other studies already funded or other trials that are underway using a similar intervention in a similar population.
  • For applications that propose the use of an app or clinical decision support software, applicants must consult with their IRB to determine whether the approach may qualify as a medical device. If so, or if in doubt, applicants must contact the FDA prior to applying to determine whether an IDE application is necessary for the proposed clinical research (https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/software-medical-device-samd/your-clinical-decision-support-software-it-medical-device).

• Letters of Support Letters of support from clinicians, clinical department chairs, and/or health care systems whose support is necessary to the successful conduct of the trial should be provided (if applicable). Applicants are also encouraged to include documentation of the commitment of any subcontractors and consultants. Letters of commitment must be co-signed by the business official of the collaborating center. In addition, if utilizing a natural product, a letter of support should document that sufficient supply of the natural product will be available for testing at the time of award, including expiration date; the supplier will meet CMC specifications; and the supplier will provide the data necessary for the investigator to adhere to NIH and FDA policies. Documentation should include a letter of agreement from the third party supplying the natural product. If parts of the costs of the trial are to be provided by sources other than NCCIH, provide letter(s) of support signed by an authorized representative. For renewal applications, a summary of progress made during the initial funding period must be included.

• Resource Sharing Plan Individuals are required to comply with the instructions for the Resource Sharing Plans as provided in the How to Apply- Application Guide.

• Other Plan(s): All instructions in the How to Apply-Application Guide must be followed, with the following additional instructions: All applicants planning research (funded or conducted in whole or in part by NIH) that results in the generation of scientific data are required to comply with the instructions for the Data Management and Sharing Plan. All applications, regardless of the amount of direct costs requested for any one year, must address a Data Management and Sharing Plan.

• Appendix: Only limited Appendix materials are allowed. Follow all instructions for the Appendix as described in the How to Apply- Application Guide. No publications or other material, with the exception of blank questionnaires or blank surveys, may be included in the Appendix.

• PHS Human Subjects and Clinical Trials Information When involving human subjects research, clinical research, and/or NIH-defined clinical trials (and when applicable, clinical trials research experience) follow all instructions for the PHS Human Subjects and Clinical Trials Information form in the How to Apply- Application Guide, with the following additional instructions: If you answered “Yes” to the question “Are Human Subjects Involved?” on the R&R Other Project Information form, you must include at least one human subjects study record using the Study Record: PHS Human Subjects and Clinical Trials Information form or Delayed Onset Study record.

  • Study Record: PHS Human Subjects and Clinical Trials Information All instructions in the How to Apply- Application Guide must be followed.
  • Section 2 - Study Population Characteristics
    • 2.5 Recruitment and Retention Plan Describe the following: 1) the planned remote recruitment methods, including use of contact lists, databases or other pre-screening resources, advertisements, outreach, media/social media, and referral networks or groups; 2) if there are known participant or study-related barriers to accrual or participation (based on literature or prior experience), please list these barriers and describe plans to address them to optimize success; 3) contingency plans for participant accrual if enrollment significantly lags behind accrual benchmarks; 4) participant retention and adherence strategies; and 5) possible competition from other trials for study participants. Investigators are encouraged to review the NCCIH Study Accrual and Retention Plan (https://nccih.nih.gov/grants/policies/SARP). Applicants must provide strong evidence of the availability of appropriate institutional resources and suitable patient populations. Documentation of the availability of eligible participants must be provided. The application must provide relevant information that addresses the feasibility of recruiting a representative sample of eligible participants nationwide utilizing remote methods.
    • 2.7 Study Timeline Milestone Plan: The milestone plan should describe the key milestones that need to be met throughout the lifecycle of the clinical trial to ensure its success, the processes that will be used to reach the milestones, and a timetable identifying when each of these key milestones will be met. All applicants must use the following definition of a milestone in their application: a scheduled event in the project timeline that signifies the completion of a major project stage or activity. Milestones must be relevant, achievable, and measurable. The research plan should include anticipated challenges to meeting milestones and propose potential mitigation or corrective actions strategies. Milestones should address overall recruitment and retention goals. Milestones of particular interest that should be described in the application may include, but are not limited to, the following:
      • Complete finalized clinical protocol
      • Final informed consent(s) and, if applicable, assent forms
      • Agreements in place for product supply
      • Comprehensive laboratory plan (as applicable)
      • Pharmacy/Laboratories Identification (as applicable)
      • Contracts/Third Party Agreements (as applicable)
      • Training plan for study staff/interventionists
      • Final Data and Safety Monitoring Plan
      • Data Completeness and Quality Monitoring Reporting Plan
      • Completion of regulatory approvals
      • A Study Accrual and Retention Plan with target dates for percent enrollment of 10, 25, 50, 75, and 100 percent of the projected recruitment for all study subjects, including women, minorities, and children (as appropriate)
      • Remote collection of data related to primary and secondary endpoints and database lock
      • Submission of primary manuscript to peer-reviewed scientific journal
      • Submission of study results to ClinicalTrials.gov within 12 months of the primary completion date
      • Biospecimens (if applicable) During the award phase, achievement of each milestone will need to be communicated to the NCCIH Program Officer listed on the Notice of Award. Award continuation, even during the period recommended for support, is conditional upon satisfactory progress. If, at any time, recruitment, as defined in the NCCIH Study Accrual and Retention Plan Policy, falls significantly below projections, or core milestones mutually agreed upon by the PD/PI and NCCIH are not met, NCCIH may consider ending support and negotiating an orderly phase-out of the award. NCCIH retains, as an option, periodic external peer review of progress. NCCIH staff will closely monitor progress at all trial stages, including milestones, accrual, and safety.
  • Section 3 - Protection and Monitoring Plans
    • 3.3 Data and Safety Monitoring Plan In addition to the NIH application requirements for data and safety monitoring for clinical trials, NCCIH requires independent monitoring for research involving human subjects. Applicants should refer to NIH’s policy on data and safety monitoring (https://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-00-038.html), as well as the NCCIH Guidelines for Data and Safety Monitoring (https://www.nccih.nih.gov/grants/policies/data-and-safety-monitoring-of-nccihfunded-clinical-research). An independent DSMB will be established to monitor data and oversee participant safety in the clinical trial. NCCIH will determine if the DSMB will be appointed and established by NCCIH or by the investigator team, in accordance with NIH and NCCIH policies. The initial DSMB or Protocol Review Committee meeting will review the awardee’s protocol and potentially recommend modifications. The DSMB should approve the protocol prior to submitting it to the single IRB. Subsequently, the DSMB will monitor and review study recruitment and retention as well as other study information, including adverse events, unanticipated problems, demographic trends, data quality, outcome data, and overall awardee performance. The DSMB has the responsibility to review interim data and final data, and recommend whether the protocol should be modified, and, at each meeting, whether the study should be continued or terminated early. Thus, the DSMB’s ethical responsibilities to the participants, as well as to the integrity of the study, are of paramount importance to NCCIH. The DSMB will meet in person or by phone at least once a year, generating a recommendation for study continuance, alteration, or stopping. Applicants should not propose DSMB members in the application, or even inquire about the interest of possible DSMB members, because anyone so contacted would not be eligible to serve as a member of the peer review committee that will evaluate the applications for scientific merit.
  • Section 4 - Protocol Synopsis
    • 4.3 Statistical Design and Power Applicants must describe the Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP). The SAP should correspond to major aims of the study and include plans for randomization, final statistical analyses, and methods for handling missing data. The power calculations must be linked to the study endpoints and to the hypothesis(es) being tested. The power calculation description should be detailed enough to allow replication of the analysis by an independent statistician. NCCIH requires a minimum of 90 percent power for the primary outcome. Multiplicity adjustment should be made if there are multiple primary outcomes. The effect size used in power calculations should be clinically meaningful. Plans for interim analyses should be described in detail and include plans to assess futility based on the inability of successfully completing the trial, due to poor enrollment or poor adherence to the intervention; conditions for early stopping due to such futility or early achievement of primary clinical outcomes; plans to assess safety; and while not common, any plans to reassess or recalculate power or to modify sample size (e.g., confirm expected event rate during the trial or confirm expected intra-class correlation (ICC) for cluster-randomized trials). If the application is not proposing interim analyses, the application should justify why they are not planned. For Phase III clinical trials, the SAP must address plans for the analysis of intervention effect differences required by the policy unless there is clear evidence that such differences are unlikely to be seen (https://grants.nih.gov/policy/inclusion/women-and-minorities.htm). Studies with adaptive designs should include a prespecified adaptation plan that specifies design type, adaptable element(s), clear decision rules, and prespecified statistical analysis boundaries.
    • 4.5. Will the study use an FDA-regulated intervention? If the proposed clinical trial will use a device, natural product (such as botanical, herbal, dietary supplement, probiotic, vitamin, or mineral), or drug, this attachment should describe correspondence from the FDA indicating whether the proposed study will require an IND/IDE. Investigators should describe the process that will be used for attaining all necessary FDA or other applicable regulatory agency approvals necessary to the conduct of the trial and associated timeline. For trials using an FDA-regulated product that requires an IND/IDE application, the grant application must include evidence regarding the outcome of a pre-IND meeting, or other evidence of communication with the FDA. If the protocol is conducted under a non-U.S. regulatory agency, the applicant should submit a plan for attaining those regulatory approvals. If the protocol is exempt from an IND/IDE, a copy of the exemption letter from the FDA should be provided as part of the PDF file attachment. The FDA has provided guidance indicating that when substances that are Generally Recognized as Safe (GRAS) are used in a clinical trial to evaluate the product’s ability to diagnose, cure, mitigate, treat, or prevent disease it may require an IND under part 312 (https://www.fda.gov/media/79386/download). If an IND is required by the FDA for the trial, the IND must be submitted to the FDA with no clinical hold imposed by the FDA prior to application being funded.
  • Section 5 - Other Clinical Trial-Related Attachments
    • 5.1 Other Clinical Trial-Related Attachments The following attachment must be included as a part of the application. Attachments permit expansion of certain elements that cannot be appropriately described in the research strategy. The attachment listed below must be provided or the application will not be peer reviewed.
      • Clinical Trial Experience Applicants must provide a detailed table listing the characteristics of trials that demonstrate the experience of the study key personnel in trial coordination in the last 5 years. The table must be provided as an attachment called “Clinical Trial Experience.pdf” and must not exceed 3 pages. If applicants propose more than one clinical trial study and are submitting more than one study record, they must use unique file names for each study record (e.g., “Clinical Trial Experience for Study Record 1.pdf,” “Clinical Trial Experience for Study Record 2.pdf,” etc.) to avoid errors uploading attachments. The table columns should include:
        • Clinical trial title
        • Applicant’s role in the trial
        • A brief description of the trial design
        • Planned enrollment
        • Actual enrollment
        • Number of sites
        • Whether the trial(s) were completed on schedule or not
        • Publication reference(s)
    • Delayed Onset Study Note: Delayed onset does NOT apply to a study that can be described but will not start immediately (i.e., delayed start). All instructions in the How to Apply- Application Guide must be followed. Do not enter a delayed onset study.
    • PHS Assignment Request Form All instructions in the How to Apply- Application Guide must be followed.

3. Unique Entity Identifier and System for Award Management (SAM) See Part 2. Section III.1 for information regarding the requirement for obtaining a unique entity identifier and for completing and maintaining active registrations in System for Award Management (SAM), NATO Commercial and Government Entity (NCAGE) Code (if applicable), eRA Commons, and Grants.gov.

4. Submission Dates and Times Part I. contains information about Key Dates and times. Applicants are encouraged to submit applications before the due date to ensure they have time to make any application corrections that might be necessary for successful submission. When a submission date falls on a weekend or Federal holiday, the application deadline is automatically extended to the next business day.

Organizations must submit applications to Grants.gov (the online portal to find and apply for grants across all Federal agencies). Applicants must then complete the submission process by tracking the status of the application in the eRA Commons, NIH’s electronic system for grants administration. NIH and Grants.gov systems check the application against many of the application instructions upon submission. Errors must be corrected and a changed/corrected application must be submitted to Grants.gov on or before the application due date and time. If a Changed/Corrected application is submitted after the deadline, the application will be considered late. Applications that miss the due date and time are subjected to the NIH Grants Policy Statement Section 2.3.9.2 Electronically Submitted Applications.

Applicants are responsible for viewing their application before the due date in the eRA Commons to ensure accurate and successful submission.

Information on the submission process and a definition of on-time submission are provided in the How to Apply-Application Guide.

5. Intergovernmental Review (E.O. 12372) This initiative is not subject to intergovernmental review.

6. Funding Restrictions All NIH awards are subject to the terms and conditions, cost principles, and other considerations described in the NIH Grants Policy Statement.

Pre-award costs are allowable only as described in the NIH Grants Policy Statement Section 7.9.1 Selected Items of Cost.

Specific to this NOFO:

• Awards issued under this NOFO will be excluded from automatic carryover. All carryover actions will require NCCIH prior approval.
• Awards issued under this NOFO will not be provided the authority to automatically extend the final budget period. All extensions, including the first, will require NCCIH prior approval.
• For trials using an FDA-regulated product and requiring an IND application, the applicant must either hold or be able to reference an open IND for the trial, or the applicant must obtain an IND with no clinical hold from the FDA prior to any award. The details of the IND status of the product should be provided in the attachment included in the study record for section 4.5. If the FDA has granted a waiver, then the applicant can provide this letter as part of the response to item 4.5 in the study record. If the protocol is conducted under a non-U.S. regulatory agency, then equivalent determinations and documentation must be provided to NCCIH prior to a grant award. Funding will not be made until the necessary regulatory approvals are in place for the conduct of the proposed clinical trial. If the product to be studied is on the DEA controlled substance list, the applicant must describe the DEA license and registrations necessary to complete the proposed trial. Again, no awards will be made until all necessary DEA licenses and registrations are in place.
• Awards issued under this NOFO will be excluded from SNAP.

7. Other Submission Requirements and Information Applications must be submitted electronically following the instructions described in the How to Apply - Application Guide. Paper applications will not be accepted.

Applicants must complete all required registrations before the application due date.

Section III. Eligibility Information contains information about registration.

For assistance with your electronic application or for more information on the electronic submission process, visit How to Apply – Application Guide. If you encounter a system issue beyond your control that threatens your ability to complete the submission process on-time, you must follow the Dealing with System Issues guidance. For assistance with application submission, contact the Application Submission Contacts in Section VII.

Important reminders:

• All PD(s)/PI(s) must include their eRA Commons ID in the Credential field of the Senior/Key Person Profile form.
• Failure to register in the Commons and to include a valid PD/PI Commons ID in the credential field will prevent the successful submission of an electronic application to NIH. See Section III of this NOFO for information on registration requirements.
• The applicant organization must ensure that the unique entity identifier provided on the application is the same identifier used in the organization’s profile in the eRA Commons and for the System for Award Management. Additional information may be found in the How to Apply - Application Guide.
• See more tips for avoiding common errors.

Upon receipt, applications will be evaluated for completeness and compliance with application instructions by the Center for Scientific Review and responsiveness by components of participating organizations, NIH. Applications that are incomplete, noncompliant, and/or nonresponsive will not be reviewed.

In order to expedite review, applicants are requested to notify the NCCIH Referral Office by email at nccih_referral@mail.nih.gov when the application has been submitted. Please include the NOFO number and title, PD/PI name, and title of the application.

Requests of $500,000 or more for direct costs in any year Applicants requesting $500,000 or more in direct costs in any year (excluding consortium F&A) must contact a Scientific/Research Contact at least 6 weeks before submitting the application and follow the Policy on the Acceptance for Review of Unsolicited Applications that Request $500,000 or More in Direct Costs as described in the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide.

Mandatory Disclosure Recipients or subrecipients must submit any information related to violations of federal criminal law involving fraud, bribery, or gratuity violations potentially affecting the federal award. See Mandatory Disclosures, 2 CFR 200.113 and NIH Grants Policy Statement Section 4.1.35.

Send written disclosures to the NIH Chief Grants Management Officer listed on the Notice of Award for the IC that funded the award and to the HHS Office of Inspector General Grant Self Disclosure Program at OIG_Disclosure@hhs.gov.

Post Submission Materials Applicants are required to follow the instructions for post-submission materials, as described in the policy. Any instructions provided here are in addition to the instructions in the policy.

All post-submission materials must be received by the Scientific Review Officer (SRO) no later than 30 calendar days prior to the peer review meeting. In addition to the post-submission materials allowed by NIH policy in NOT-OD-19-083, the following post-submission materials are allowed:

• Revised Clinical Trial Experience Table (e.g., due to updated enrollment numbers, publication of trial results, or newly started clinical trials)
• Revised Milestones Plan (e.g., due to the hiring, replacement, or loss of an investigator; change to health care systems participating in the trial; or change in electronic health record or IT infrastructure)
• Updates to section 4.5 on communications with the FDA in regard to IND/IDE requirements

Section V. Application Review Information

1. Criteria Only the review criteria described below will be considered in the review process. Applications submitted to the NIH in support of the NIH mission are evaluated for scientific and technical merit through the NIH peer review system.

Overall Impact Reviewers will provide an overall impact score to reflect their assessment of the likelihood for the project to exert a sustained, powerful influence on the research field(s) involved, in consideration of the following scored review criteria and additional review criteria (as applicable for the project proposed). An application does not need to be strong in all categories to be judged likely to have a major scientific impact.

Scored Review Criteria Reviewers will consider Factors 1, 2 and 3 in the determination of scientific merit, and in providing an overall impact score. In addition, Factors 1 and 2 will each receive a separate factor score.

• Factor 1. Importance of the Research (Significance and Innovation)

  • Significance: Evaluate the importance of the proposed research in the context of current scientific challenges and opportunities, either for advancing knowledge within the field, or more broadly. Assess whether the application addresses an important gap in knowledge in the field, would solve a critical problem, or create a valuable conceptual or technical advance. Evaluate the rationale for undertaking the study, the rigor of the scientific background for the work (e.g., prior literature and/or preliminary data) and whether the scientific background justifies the proposed study.
  • Innovation: Evaluate the extent to which innovation influences the importance of undertaking the proposed research. Note that while technical or conceptual innovation can influence the importance of the proposed research, a project that is not applying novel concepts or approaches may be of critical importance for the field. Evaluate whether the proposed work applies novel concepts, methods or technologies or uses existing concepts, methods, technologies in novel ways, to enhance the overall impact of the project.
  • Specific to this NOFO:
    • Evaluate if the justification for a remotely delivered design is adequate.
    • For pragmatic studies that integrate an intervention into an organization, evaluate the strength of the evidence of efficacy or effectiveness for the intervention.
    • For studies that propose to improve adherence to established guidelines, evaluate how strong the evidence is for the guidelines that are being used.
    • Evaluate the mechanisms for leveraging novel collaboration and/or study oversight strategies.

• Factor 2. Rigor and Feasibility (Approach)

  • Rigor: Evaluate the scientific quality of the proposed work. Evaluate the likelihood that compelling, reproducible findings will result (rigor) and assess whether the proposed studies can be done well and within the timeframes proposed (feasibility).
    • Evaluate the rigor of experimental design and whether appropriate controls are in place.
    • Evaluate whether the sample size is sufficient and well-justified.
    • Assess the quality of the plans for analysis, interpretation, and reporting of results.
    • Evaluate whether the investigators presented adequate plans to address relevant biological variables, such as sex or age, in the design, analysis, and reporting.
    • For applications involving human subjects or vertebrate animals, also evaluate:
      • the rigor of the intervention or study manipulation (if applicable to the study design).
      • whether outcome variables are justified.
      • whether the results will be generalizable or, in the case of a rare disease/special group, relevant to the particular subgroup.
      • whether the sample is appropriate and sufficiently diverse to address the proposed question(s).
      • For applications involving human subjects, including clinical trials, assess the adequacy of inclusion plans as appropriate for the scientific goals of the research. Considerations of appropriateness may include disease/condition/behavior incidence, prevalence, or population burden, population representation, and/or current state of the science.
  • Feasibility: Evaluate whether the proposed approach is sound and achievable, including plans to address problems or new challenges that emerge in the work. For proposed studies in which feasibility may be less certain, evaluate whether the uncertainty is balanced by the potential for major advances.
    • For applications involving human subjects, including clinical trials, evaluate the adequacy and feasibility of the plan to recruit and retain a study population that appropriately models the target population. Additionally, evaluate the likelihood of successfully achieving the proposed enrollment based on age, race, ethnicity, and sex.
    • For clinical trial applications, evaluate whether the study timeline and milestones are feasible.
  • Specific to this NOFO:
    • Evaluate the strength of the preliminary data about the remotely delivered intervention, including whether the intervention is well tolerated, is feasible, has been demonstrated to be reliably delivered remotely with fidelity and adherence, and meets the appropriateness of the remote intervention delivery methods. Evaluate whether the primary outcome is a valid measure for the proposed condition and population and whether potential adverse events can be monitored and addressed remotely.
    • If the application includes a natural product, evaluate the strength of the preliminary data including whether the evidence about the natural product:
      • Demonstrates target engagement in a replicable manner, unless it is impossible or impractical to do so.
      • Demonstrates bioavailability for natural products that must be absorbed for biological activity.
      • Justifies the selected dose and frequency of dosing based on published pharmacokinetic data.
      • Demonstrates the natural product is well tolerated,
      • Demonstrates a correlation between target engagement and clinical outcomes proposed in the trial.
    • Evaluate the strength of the evidence for equipoise.
    • Evaluate whether the investigators presented an adequate clinical protocol synopsis to describe the necessary elements of the clinical trial for a fully remotely delivered design.
    • Evaluate whether the complementary and integrative health intervention is appropriately characterized.
    • Evaluate whether the plans to recruit and retain a generalizable sample of participants utilizing remote methods are appropriate.
    • Evaluate if the application adequately addresses the appropriate regulatory requirements (IND, IDE, DEA) and the required training and/or licensure/credentialing of individuals providing the intervention across the proposed geographic areas.
    • Evaluate whether plans to protect data security are appropriate.
    • For Phase III clinical trial applications, evaluate the likelihood of successfully achieving adequate numbers of subgroups of participants to allow for separate and adequately powered analyses.

• Factor 3. Expertise and Resources (Investigator(s) and Environment)

  • Investigator(s): Evaluate whether the investigator(s) have demonstrated background, training, and expertise, as appropriate for their career stage, to conduct the proposed work. For Multiple Principal Investigator (MPI) applications, assess the quality of the leadership plan to facilitate coordination and collaboration.
  • Environment: Evaluate whether the institutional resources are appropriate to ensure the successful execution of the proposed work.
  • Specific to this NOFO:
    • Evaluate the investigative team’s collective track record of completing and publishing the results of clinical trials.
    • Based on the clinical experience attachment, consider whether the team has successfully recruited a similar study population and delivered a similar intervention in previous clinical trials using remote methods.
    • In addition, for studies proposing pragmatic trials within organizations (e.g., schools, health care systems, community organizations), evaluate:
      • Whether teams include appropriate collaborators from the participating organizations.
      • If the PD(s)/PI(s) and key personnel have the necessary expertise in design and implementation of large-scale clinical studies within organizations (e.g., expertise in using electronic health records or other relevant records for recruitment and outcomes assessment).
      • Whether the PD(s)/PI(s) have a track record of successful remote recruitment and retention in prior studies, investigative collaborations, or partnerships with (within) organizations in conducting clinical studies.
    • Evaluate the strength of evidence that the environment has the resources necessary to conduct a remotely delivered intervention with remote recruitment, intervention delivery, and data collection in a safe, secure, and timely fashion.
    • For studies proposing pragmatic trials within organizations, evaluate:
      • The rationale for the organizations selected for the project.
      • The commitment from the organizations to the project.
      • The infrastructure and expertise (e.g., clinical investigators, informaticists) needed to implement the proposed pragmatic trial within all proposed organizations.

Additional Review Criteria As applicable for the project proposed, reviewers will consider the following additional items while determining scientific and technical merit, but will not give criterion scores for these items, and should consider them in providing an overall impact score.

• Protections for Human Subjects For research that involves human subjects but does not involve one of the categories of research that are exempt under 45 CFR Part 46, evaluate the justification for involvement of human subjects and the proposed protections from research risk relating to their participation according to the following five review criteria: 1) risk to subjects; 2) adequacy of protection against risks; 3) potential benefits to the subjects and others; 4) importance of the knowledge to be gained; and 5) data and safety monitoring for clinical trials. For research that involves human subjects and meets the criteria for one or more of the categories of research that are exempt under 45 CFR Part 46, evaluate: 1) the justification for the exemption; 2) human subjects involvement and characteristics; and 3) sources of materials. For additional information on review of the Human Subjects section, please refer to the Guidelines for the Review of Human Subjects.
• Vertebrate Animals When the proposed research includes Vertebrate Animals, evaluate the involvement of live vertebrate animals according to the following criteria: (1) description of proposed procedures involving animals, including species, strains, ages, sex, and total number to be used; (2) justifications for the use of animals versus alternative models and for the appropriateness of the species proposed; (3) interventions to minimize discomfort, distress, pain and injury; and (4) justification for euthanasia method if NOT consistent with the AVMA Guidelines for the Euthanasia of Animals. For additional information on review of the Vertebrate Animals section, please refer to the Worksheet for Review of the Vertebrate Animals Section.
• Biohazards When the proposed research includes Biohazards, evaluate whether specific materials or procedures that will be used are significantly hazardous to research personnel and/or the environment, and whether adequate protection is proposed.
• Resubmissions As applicable, evaluate the full application as now presented.
• Renewals As applicable, evaluate the progress made in the last funding period.
• Revisions As applicable, evaluate the appropriateness of the proposed expansion of the scope of the project.

Additional Review Considerations As applicable for the project proposed, reviewers will consider each of the following items, but will not give scores for these items, and should not consider them in providing an overall impact score.

• Authentication of Key Biological and/or Chemical Resources For projects involving key biological and/or chemical resources, evaluate the brief plans proposed for identifying and ensuring the validity of those resources.
• Budget and Period of Support Evaluate whether the budget and the requested period of support are fully justified and reasonable in relation to the proposed research.

2. Review and Selection Process Applications will be evaluated for scientific and technical merit by (an) appropriate Scientific Review Group(s) convened by NCCIH, in accordance with NIH peer review policy and procedures, using the stated review criteria. Assignment to a Scientific Review Group will be shown in the eRA Commons.

As part of the scientific peer review, all applications will receive a written critique.

Applications may undergo a selection process in which only those applications deemed to have the highest scientific and technical merit (generally the top half of applications under review) will be discussed and assigned an overall impact score.

Applications will be assigned on the basis of established PHS referral guidelines to the appropriate NIH Institute or Center. Applications will compete for available funds with all other recommended applications submitted in response to this NOFO. Following initial peer review, recommended applications will receive a second level of review by the appropriate national Advisory Council or Board. The following will be considered in making funding decisions, consistent with applicable law.

• Scientific and technical merit of the proposed project as determined by scientific peer review.
• Availability of funds.
• Relevance of the proposed project to program priorities.

Please note that reviewers will not consider race, ethnicity, age, or sex of a researcher, award participant, or trainee, even in part, in providing critiques, scores, or funding recommendations. NIH will not consider such factors in making its funding decisions.

If the application is under consideration for funding, NIH will request "just-in-time" information from the applicant as described in the NIH Grants Policy Statement Section 2.5.1. Just-in-Time Procedures. This request is not a Notice of Award nor should it be construed to be an indicator of possible funding.

Prior to making an award, NIH reviews an applicant’s federal award history in SAM.gov to ensure sound business practices. An applicant can review and comment on any information in the Responsibility/Qualification records available in SAM.gov. NIH will consider any comments by the applicant in the Responsibility/Qualification records in SAM.gov to ascertain the applicant’s integrity, business ethics, and performance record of managing Federal awards per 2 CFR Part 200.206 “Federal awarding agency review of risk posed by applicants.” This provision will apply to all NIH grants and cooperative agreements except fellowships.

3. Anticipated Announcement and Award Dates After the peer review of the application is completed, the PD/PI will be able to access his or her Summary Statement (written critique) via the eRA Commons. Refer to Part 1 for dates for peer review, advisory council review, and earliest start date.

Information regarding the disposition of applications is available in the NIH Grants Policy Statement Section 2.4.4 Disposition of Applications.

Section VI. Award Administration Information

1. Award Notices A Notice of Award (NoA) is the official authorizing document notifying the applicant that an award has been made and that funds may be requested from the designated HHS payment system or office. The NoA is signed by the Grants Management Officer and emailed to the recipient’s business official.

In accepting the award, the recipient agrees that any activities under the award are subject to all provisions currently in effect or implemented during the period of the award, other Department regulations and policies in effect at the time of the award, and applicable statutory provisions.

Recipients must comply with any funding restrictions described in Section IV.6. Funding Restrictions. Any pre-award costs incurred before receipt of the NoA are at the applicant's own risk. For more information on the Notice of Award, please refer to the NIH Grants Policy Statement Section 5. The Notice of Award and NIH Grants & Funding website, see Award Process.

Individual awards are based on the application submitted to, and as approved by, the NIH and are subject to the IC-specific terms and conditions identified in the NoA.

• ClinicalTrials.gov: If an award provides for one or more clinical trials. By law (Title VIII, Section 801 of Public Law 110-85), the "responsible party" must register and submit results information for certain “applicable clinical trials” on the ClinicalTrials.gov Protocol Registration and Results System Information Website (https://register.clinicaltrials.gov). NIH expects registration and results reporting of all trials whether required under the law or not. For more information, see https://grants.nih.gov/policy/clinical-trials/reporting/index.htm
• Institutional Review Board or Independent Ethics Committee Approval: Recipient institutions must ensure that all protocols are reviewed by their IRB or IEC. To help ensure the safety of participants enrolled in NIH-funded studies, the recipient must provide NIH copies of documents related to all major changes in the status of ongoing protocols.
• Data and Safety Monitoring Requirements: The NIH policy for data and safety monitoring requires oversight and monitoring of all NIH-conducted or -supported human biomedical and behavioral intervention studies (clinical trials) to ensure the safety of participants and the validity and integrity of the data. Further information concerning these requirements is found at http://grants.nih.gov/grants/policy/hs/data_safety.htm and in the application instructions (SF424 (R&R) and PHS 398).
• Investigational New Drug or Investigational Device Exemption Requirements: Consistent with federal regulations, clinical research projects involving the use of investigational therapeutics, vaccines, or other medical interventions (including licensed products and devices for a purpose other than that for which they were licensed) in humans under a research protocol must be performed under a Food and Drug Administration (FDA) investigational new drug (IND) or investigational device exemption (IDE).

2. Administrative and National Policy Requirements The following Federal wide and HHS-specific policy requirements apply to awards funded through NIH:

• The rules listed at 2 CFR Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards.
• All NIH grant and cooperative agreement awards include the NIH Grants Policy Statement as part of the terms and conditions in the Notice of Award (NoA). The NoA includes the requirements of this NOFO. For these terms of award, see the NIH Grants Policy Statement Part II: Terms and Conditions of NIH Grant Awards, Subpart A: General and Part II: Terms and Conditions of NIH Grant Awards, Subpart B: Terms and Conditions for Specific Types of Grants, Recipients, and Activities.
• If a recipient receives an award, the recipient must follow all applicable nondiscrimination laws. The recipient agrees to this when registering in SAM.gov. The recipient must also submit an Assurance of Compliance (HHS-690). To learn more, see the Laws and Regulations Enforced by the HHS Office for Civil Rights website.
• HHS recognizes that NIH research projects are often limited in scope for many reasons that are nondiscriminatory, such as the principal investigator’s scientific interest, funding limitations, recruitment requirements, and other considerations. Thus, criteria in research protocols that target or exclude certain populations are warranted where nondiscriminatory justifications establish that such criteria are appropriate with respect to the health or safety of the subjects, the scientific study design, or the purpose of the research. For additional guidance regarding how the provisions apply to NIH grant programs, please contact the Scientific/Research Contact that is identified in Section VII under Agency Contacts of this NOFO.
• All federal statutes and regulations relevant to federal financial assistance, including those highlighted in NIH Grants Policy Statement Section 4 Public Policy Requirements, Objectives and Other Appropriation Mandates.
• Recipients are responsible for ensuring that their activities comply with all applicable federal regulations. NIH may terminate awards under certain circumstances. See 2 CFR Part 200.340 Termination and NIH Grants Policy Statement Section 8.5.2 Remedies for Noncompliance or Enforcement Actions: Suspension, Termination, and Withholding of Support.

Successful recipients under this NOFO agree that: Where the award funding involves implementing, acquiring, or upgrading health IT for activities by any funded entity, recipients and subrecipient(s) are required to: Use health IT that meets standards and implementation specifications adopted in 45 CFR part 170, Subpart B, if such standards and implementation specifications can support the activity. Visit https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-45/subtitle-A/subchapter-D/part-170/subpart-B to learn more. Where the award funding involves implementing, acquiring, or upgrading health IT for activities by eligible clinicians in ambulatory settings, or hospitals, eligible under Sections 4101, 4102, and 4201 of the HITECH Act, use health IT certified under the ONC Health IT Certification Program if certified technology can support the activity. Visit https://www.healthit.gov/topic/certification-ehrs/certification-health-it to learn more.

Pursuant to the Cybersecurity Act of 2015, Div. N, § 405, Pub. Law 114-113, 6 USC § 1533(d), the HHS Secretary has established a common set of voluntary, consensus-based, and industry-led guidelines, best practices, methodologies, procedures, and processes.

Successful recipients under this NOFO agree that: When recipients, subrecipients, or third-party entities have:

• ongoing and consistent access to HHS owned or operated information or operational technology systems; and
• receive, maintain, transmit, store, access, exchange, process, or utilize personal identifiable information (PII) or personal health information (PHI) obtained from the awarding HHS agency for the purposes of executing the award. Recipients shall develop plans and procedures, modeled after the NIST Cybersecurity framework, to protect HHS systems and data. Please refer to NIH Post-Award Monitoring and Reporting for additional information.

Cooperative Agreement Terms and Conditions of Award Not Applicable

3. Data Management and Sharing Consistent with the 2023 NIH Policy for Data Management and Sharing, when data management and sharing is applicable to the award, recipients will be required to adhere to the Data Management and Sharing requirements as outlined in the NIH Grants Policy Statement. Upon the approval of a Data Management and Sharing Plan, it is required for recipients to implement the plan as described.

4. Reporting When multiple years are involved, recipients will be required to submit the Research Performance Progress Report (RPPR) annually and financial statements as required in the NIH Grants Policy Statement Section 8.4.1 Reporting.

To learn more about post-award monitoring and reporting, see the NIH Grants & Funding website, see Post-Award Monitoring and Reporting.

A final RPPR, invention statement, and the expenditure data portion of the Federal Financial Report are required for closeout of an award, as described in the NIH Grants Policy Statement Section 8.6 Closeout. NIH NOFOs outline intended research goals and objectives. Post award, NIH will review and measure performance based on the details and outcomes that are shared within the RPPR, as described at 2 CFR Part 200.301.

Section VII. Agency Contacts

We encourage inquiries concerning this funding opportunity and welcome the opportunity to answer questions from potential applicants.

Application Submission Contacts

• eRA Service Desk (Questions regarding ASSIST, eRA Commons, application errors and warnings, documenting system problems that threaten submission by the due date, and post-submission issues)
  • Finding Help Online: https://www.era.nih.gov/need-help (preferred method of contact)
  • Telephone: 301-402-7469 or 866-504-9552 (Toll Free)
• General Grants Information (Questions regarding application instructions, application processes, and NIH grant resources)
  • Email: grantsinfo@od.nih.gov (preferred method of contact)
  • Telephone: 301-480-7075
• Grants.gov Customer Support (Questions regarding Grants.gov registration and Workspace)
  • Contact Center Telephone: 800-518-4726
  • Email: support@grants.gov

Scientific/Research Contact(s)

• Beda Jean-Francois, Ph.D. National Center for Complementary & Integrative Health (NCCIH) Phone: 202-313-2144 Email: beda.jean-françois@nih.gov

Peer Review Contact(s)

• Jessica McKlveen, PhD National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH) Telephone: 301-594-8018 Email: jessica.mcclveen@nih.gov

Financial/Grants Management Contact(s)

• Debbie Chen National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH) Phone: 301-594-3788 Email: debbie.chen@nih.gov

Section VIII. Other Information

Recently issued trans-NIH policy notices may affect your application submission. A full list of policy notices published by NIH is provided in the NIH Guide for Grants and Contracts. All awards are subject to the terms and conditions, cost principles, and other considerations described in the NIH Grants Policy Statement.

Authority and Regulations Awards are made under the authorization of Sections 301 and 405 of the Public Health Service Act as amended (42 USC 241 and 284) and under Federal Regulations 42 CFR Part 52 and 2 CFR Part 200.

Weekly TOC for this Announcement NIH Funding Opportunities and Notices Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) NIH... Turning Discovery Into Health ®